2024 Volume 4 Issue 1
Creative Commons License

Statistical Data from 1979 to 2022 on Prostate Cancer in Populations of Northern and Central Mexico


, , , , ,
  1. Pharmacochemistry Research Laboratory, Faculty of Biological-Chemical Sciences, University Autonomous of Campeche; Humberto Lanz Cárdenas s/n, Ex Hacienda Kalá, C.P. 24085, Campeche, Mexico.

  2. Nutrition Laboratory, Faculty of Nutrition, University of Veracruz, Medicos y s/n Odontologos 910210, Unidad del Bosque, Xalapa, Mexico.

  3. Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Veracruzana, Médicos y Odontologos s/n C.P. 91010, Unidad del Bosque Xalapa Veracru, Mexico..  

Abstract

For several years, prostate cancer has increased worldwide, resulting in a decrease in life expectancy in men. Recently, the World Health Organization reported that this clinical pathology was associated with an increased mortality rate in patients aged 60 to > 60 years. This investigation aimed to analyze some statistical data on prostate cancer in Central and northern Mexico (45 to 64; 65 and ˃ 65 years) populations using the Information System of the Ministry of Health of Mexico. Statistical data showed a higher mortality degree in Mexico City compared to Hidalgo, Morelos, Puebla, Querétaro, and Tlaxcala. Other data on mortality in regions of Northern Mexico indicate that the population of Nuevo León had a higher mortality degree compared to California, Southern California, Chihuahua, Coahuila, and Durango. These results may be associated with differences in the population size of each region involved in Central and Northern cities, Mexico, or some specific demographic factors of each city. It is important to mention that it is necessary to analyze other types of risk factors related to prostate cancer development in Mexico, to have a good data system that serves as an axis for population clinical diagnosis.


Keywords: Prostate, Cancer statistic data, Central and North Mexico, WHO

Introduction

Prostate cancer has increased dramatically in recent years, increasing mortality worldwide [1-5]. There are several risk factors to produce prostate cancer such as age [6-9], race [10-14], obesity [15-18], testosterone [19-23], and others. Some data (Figure 1) of Age-Standardized mortality Rate worldwide per 100,000, in 2022 year showed the following values for Africa 17.3, Latin America and the Caribbean 13.9, Oceania 11.5, Europe 11.2, Northern America 8.3, and Asia 3.8 (Source, World Health Organization).

 

Figure 1. Age-standardized rate worldwide per 100 000, Mortality, Males, in 2022 in continents. Source: World Health Organization.

Other data showed that in the United States, there was an incidence of prostate cancer cases in 2022 of 268,490 and a mortality rate of 12.84% (34,500) [24].  Additionally, a study showed increases in the mortality rate from prostate cancer in Canada between 1992 and 2010 [25]. Furthermore, a study carried out on the border between the United States and Mexico showed a Hispanic population (170,640) with prostate cancer problems [26].

On the other hand, a report showed that prostate cancer was the most common cancer in men living in Mérida City, Mexico from 2015 to 2018 [27]. Another study carried out in Mexico from 1990- 2013 showed an incidence of 35.5, and 6.529 deaths [28]. Furthermore, a study indicates that in Mexico from 1980 to 1995, 32,349 deaths were associated with prostate cancer [29]. Other data on prostate cancer incidence in Mexico from 2019 show that the highest percentage of deaths from this clinical pathology occurred among the age groups of 70 to 79 and 80 to 89 years [30]. A recent statistical analysis was conducted on the incidence of prostate cancer in the population of southern Mexico, covering the years 1978 to 2020. The findings revealed that the fatality rate attributed to prostate cancer in Veracruz City surpassed that of other cities in southern Mexico [31].

The objective of this study was to examine statistical data on prostate cancer in Central and Northern Mexico from 1979 to 2022 by utilizing the Information System of the Ministry of Health Mexico.

Materials and Methods

An analysis of prostate cancer incidence and mortality rates from 1979 to 2020 was conducted using data obtained from the World Health Organization. Furthermore, statistical data regarding prostate cancer in Mexico was acquired from the information system of the Health Secretary of Mexico [32]. It is worth mentioning that additional data systems, such as Google Scholar and PubMed, were utilized to present certain statistics on prostate cancer.

Results and Discussion

Table 1 and Figures 2 and 3 show the mortality values recorded in the cities of central Mexico from 1979 to 2022 in patients with prostate problems between 45 and 65 years of age. It is noteworthy that Mexico City had a higher mortality rate compared to Hidalgo, Morelos, Puebla, Queretaro, and Tlaxcala. Besides, Puebla City showed a higher mortality rate (45 and 65 years) in the prostate cancer population in comparison with Hidalgo, Morelos, Queretaro, and Tlaxcala.

Table 1. The mortality rate for prostate cancer population in Central cities, Mexico (1979.2022)

City

45 to 64 years

65 and  ˃ 65 years

Mexico

Hidalgo

Morelos

Puebla

Queretaro

Tlaxcala

169

21

22

64

15

5

2247

556

418

1407

299

298

 

 

(a)

(b)

Figure 2. Statistical data on prostate cancer for Hidalgo and Mexico Cities from 1979 to 2022. Source: Health Secretary, General Directorate of Health Information. http://sinaiscap.salud.gob.mx:8080/DGIS/

 

 

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

Figure 3. Statistical data on prostate cancer for Mexico, Morelos, Puebla, Queretaro, and Tlaxcala from 1979 to 2022. Source: Health Secretary, General Directorate of Health Information. http://sinaiscap.salud.gob. mx:8080/DGIS/

 

Other results displayed that mortality from cancer prostate was higher in the Nuevo Leon population (65 and ˃ 65 years) compared with California, South California, Chihuahua, Coahuila, Durango, Sinaloa, and Sonora. However, the Sinaloa population with cancer prostate was higher in comparison with California, South California, Chihuahua, Coahuila, Durango, Nuevo Leon, and Sonora (Table 2, Figures 4 and 5).

 

Table 2. The mortality rate for prostate cancer population in North cities, Mexico (1979.2022)

City

45 to 64 years

65 and  ˃ 65 years

California

South California

Chihuahua

Coahuila

Durango

Nuevo Leon

Sinaloa

Sonora

Tamaulipas

33

2

50

29

23

24

39

24

40

329

77

618

548

329

701

532

447

655

 

 

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

Figure 4. Statistical data on prostate cancer for California, South California, Chihuahua, and Coahuila from 1979 to 2022. Source: Health Secretary, General Directorate of Health Information. http://sinaiscap.salud.gob.mx:8080/DGIS/

 

 

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

(e)

Figure 5. Statistical values on prostate cancer for Durango, Nuevo Leon, Sinaloa, Sonora, and Tamaulipas from 1979 to 2022. Source: Health Secretary, General Directorate of Health Information. http://sinaiscap.salud.gob.mx:8080/DGIS/

All these data indicate variations in mortality degree in different populations of Central and Northern Mexico. This phenomenon could be due to several factors, such as population size or other risk factors such as obesity. This hypothesis is supported by some studies conducted from 1997 to 2002 in 639 participants to evaluate the relationship between body mass index and prostate cancer. The results showed 450 deaths from any cause and 134 deaths from prostate cancer. Additionally, this study indicates that weight gain >5% was associated with a higher rate of prostate cancer [33]. Another study from 1986 to 2012 displayed an association between obesity and the risk of prostate cancer progression in 5,158 men with prostate cancer [34].

On the other hand, some studies suggest that prostate cancer may be associated with higher fat consumption within the diet [35]. For example, a prospective population-based report on 25,708 Norwegian men showed that a high-fat diet may be related to prostate cancer [36]. These data suggest that fat intake could increase prostate cancer levels, resulting in an increased degree of mortality in the worldwide population. However, some studies indicate that other factors are related to prostate cancer rates, such as race, ethnicity [37, 38], geography [39], lifestyle [40-44], and testosterone concentration [45-48]. In this way, in the literature, some reports indicate that geographical conditions could condition the mortality degree from prostate cancer in different populations worldwide. This hypothesis could be supported by some studies that indicate that men who live in disadvantaged areas do not have the necessary services for a good life expectancy, which can increase prostate cancer levels. Another study involved 2,779 men with prostate cancer and 1,606 men without a cancer diagnosis, recruited in New Zealand, the US, and Taiwan. In this study, the relationship between prostate cancer with some demographic aspects and lifestyle was analyzed using multiple and univariate linear regression models; the results showed an association between different demographic factors and prostate cancer [49]. Contrary to these data, other studies showed that prostate cancer increased in the United States and some Scandinavian countries, compared to different developing countries [50].

Conclusion

This study examines the correlation between the death rate and prostate cancer in central and northern Mexico from 1979 to 2022, utilizing data from the Mexican Ministry of Health's information system. Statistical results showed that aging and possibly demographic factors are some risk parameters for prostate cancer development in Mexico. Furthermore, it is important to mention that the population size of each region could condition the mortality rate ​​for this clinical pathology.

Acknowledgments: None.

Conflict of interest: None.

Financial support: None.

Ethics statement: All procedures in this study were performed by protocols for the Pharmacochemistry Laboratory of the University Autonomous of Campeche.

References
  1. Hamdy F, Donovan J, Lane J, Metcalfe C, Davis M, Turner E, et al. Fifteen-year outcomes after monitoring, surgery, or radiotherapy for prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2023;388(17):1547-58. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2214122
  2. Wei J, Barocas D, Carlsson S, Coakley F, Eggener S, Etzioni R, et al. Early detection of prostate cancer: AUA/SUO guideline part I: Prostate cancer screening. J Urol. 2023;210(1):46-53. doi:10.1097/JU.0000000000003491
  3. Miller K, Nogueira L, Devasia T, Mariotto A, Yabroff K, Jemal A, et al. Cancer treatment and survivorship statistics, 2022. Cancer J Clin. 2022;72(5):409-36. doi:10.3322/caac.21731
  4. Siegel R, Giaquinto A, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2024. Cancer J Clin. 2024;74(1):12-49. doi:10.3322/caac.21820
  5. Bray F, Laversanne M, Sung H, Ferlay J, Siege R, Soerjomataram I, et al. Global cancer statistics 2022: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. Cancer J Clin. 2024;74(3):229-63. doi:10.3322/caac.21834
  6. Obeagu E, Obeagu G. Breast cancer: A review of risk factors and diagnosis. Medicine. 2024;103(3):e36905. doi:10.1097/MD.0000000000036905
  7. Jemal A, Culp M, Ma J, Islami F, Fedewa S. Prostate cancer incidence 5 years after US preventive services task force recommendations against screening. J Nat Cancer Inst. 2021;113(1):64-71. doi:10.1093/jnci/djaa068
  8. Boschheidgen M, Albers P, Schlemmer H, Hellms S, Bonekamp D, Sauter A, et al. Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in prostate cancer screening at the age of 45 years: Results from the first screening round of the PROBASE trial. Eur Urol. 2024;85(2):105-11. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2023. 09.027
  9. Contieri R, Grajales V, Tan W, Martini A, Sood A, Hensley P, et al. Impact of age> 70 years on oncological outcomes in patients with non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer treated with Bacillus Calmette-Guérin. BJU Int. 2024;133(1):63-70. doi:10.1111/bju.16127
  10. Rebbeck T. Prostate cancer genetics: Variation by race, ethnicity, and geography. Semin Rad Oncol. 2017;27(1):3-10. doi:10.1016/j.semradonc.2016.08.002
  11. Westrick A, Zhu P, Friese C, Langa K, Kobayashi L. The association of pre-cancer diagnosis cardiovascular risk factors with memory aging after a cancer diagnosis, overall and by race/ethnicity. J Cancer Surv. 2024:1-10.
  12. Himmelstein G, Ganz P. Distribution of cancer care resources across US Hospitals by patient race and ethnicity. J Am Med Assoc Oncol. 2024;10(1):134-7. doi:10.1001/jamaoncol. 2023.4952
  13. Lemos L, Souza M, Guerra A, Piazza T, Araújo R, Cherchiglia M. Racial disparities in breast cancer survival after treatment initiation in Brazil: A nationwide cohort study. Lancet Glob Health. 2024;12(2):e292-e305. doi:10.1016/S2214-109X(23)00521-1
  14. Gramatges M. Understanding and addressing race disparities in childhood cancer outcomes. Nat Rev Cancer. 2024;24(2):91-2.
  15. Piening A, Ebert E, Gottlieb C, Khojandi N, Kuehm L, Hoft S, et al. Obesity-related T cell dysfunction impairs immunosurveillance and increases cancer risk. Nat Comm. 2024;15(1):2835.
  16. Lagarde C, Kavalakatt J, Benz M, Hawes M, Arbogast C, Cullen N, et al. Obesity-associated epigenetic alterations and the obesity-breast cancer axis. Oncogene. 2024:1-13.
  17. Wang L, Wang W, Kaelber DC, Xu R, Berger N. GLP-1 receptor agonists and colorectal cancer risk in drug-naive patients with type 2 diabetes, with and without overweight/obesity. J Am Med Assoc Oncol. 2024;10(2):256-8. doi:10.1001/jamaoncol.2023.5573
  18. Oze I, Ito H, Koyanagi Y, Abe S, Rahman M, Islam M, et al. Obesity is associated with biliary tract cancer mortality and incidence: A pooled analysis of 21 cohort studies in the Asia Cohort Consortium. Int J Cancer. 2024;154(7):1174-90. doi:10.1002/ijc.34794
  19. Jiang C, Xu F, Yi D, Jiang B, Wang R, Wu L, et al. Testosterone promotes the migration, invasion and EMT process of papillary thyroid carcinoma by up-regulating Tnnt1. J Endocrinol Invest. 2024;47(1):149-66.
  20. Wong H, Chiu P, Puche-Sanz I, Xue Z, Chen D, Gomez-Gomez E, et al. Lower baseline testosterone level is related to earlier development of castration resistance in metastatic prostate cancer: A multi-center cohort study. Front Oncol. 2024;14:1321522. doi:10.3389/fonc.2024.1321522
  21. Asanad K, Horns J, Driggs N, Samplaski M, Hotaling J. Untreated hypogonadism and testosterone replacement therapy in hypogonadal men are associated with a decreased risk of subsequent prostate cancer: A population-based study. Int J Imp Res. 2024:1-4.
  22. Nabid A, Carrier N, Vigneault E, Martin A, Bahary J, Van-Nguyen T, et al. Testosterone recovery after androgen deprivation therapy in localised prostate cancer: Long-term data from two randomised trials. Radiother Oncol. 2024;195:110256. doi:10.1016/j.radonc.2024.110256
  23. Yin X, Gu H, Ning D, Li Y, Tang H. Testosterone exacerbates the formation of liver cancer induced by environmental N-nitrosamines exposure: Potential mechanisms and implications for human health. Onco Targ Ther. 2024;17:395-409. doi:10.2147/OTT.S456746
  24. Washington C, Goldstein D, Moore A, Gardner U, Deville C. Health disparities in prostate cancer and approaches to advance equitable care. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. 2022;42:1-6. doi:10.1200/EDBK_350751
  25. Siegel R, Miller K, Fuchs H, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2021. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71(1):7-33.
  26. Taylor Z, Chew L, Tumey T, Gard C, Woods M. Differences in incidence, staging, and survival of urologic cancers in patients under 65 living in the US-Mexico border region. Curr Urol. 2022:10-97. doi:10.1097/CU9.0000000000000107
  27. Leal Y, Torres J, Gamboa R, Mantilla-Morales A, Piña-Sanchez P, Arrieta O. Cancer incidence in Merida, Mexico 2015-2018: First report from the population-based cancer registry. Arch Med Res. 2022;53(8):859-66. doi:10.1016/j.arcmed. 2022.11.015
  28. Gómez-Dantés H, Lamadrid-Figueroa H, Cahuana-Hurtado L, Silverman-Retana O, Montero P. The burden of cancer in Mexico, 1990-2013. Salud Pub Mexico. 2016;58(2):118-31.
  29. Tovar‐Guzmán V, Hernández‐Girón C, López‐Ríos O, Lazcano‐Ponce E. Prostate cancer mortality trends in Mexico, 1980–1995. Prostate. 1999;39(1):23-7. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0045(19990401)39:1%3C23::AID-PROS4%3E3.0.CO;2-I
  30. Beltran-Ontiveros S, Fernandez-Galindo M, Moreno-Ortiz J, Contreras-Gutierrez JA, Madueña-Molina J, Arambula-Meraz E, et al. Incidence, mortality, and trends of prostate cancer in Mexico from 2000 to 2019: Results from the global burden of disease study 2019. Cancers. 2022;14(13):3184. doi:10.3390/cancers14133184
  31. Figueroa-Valverde L, Rosas-Nexticapa M, Alvarez-Ramirez M, Lopez-Ramos M, Mateu-Armand V.  Statistical data (1978-2020) on prostate cancer in the southern population of Mexico. Clin Cancer Invest J. 2023;12(1):7-10. doi:10.51847/ LkyjT987Fn
  32. Mexican government. Information system of the secretary of health. Available from: http://sinaiscap.salud.gob.mx:8080/ DGIS/
  33. Bonn S, Wiklund F, Sjölander A, Szulkin R, Stattin P, Holmberg, E, et al. Body mass index and weight change in men with prostate cancer: Progression and mortality. Cancer Causes Cont. 2014;25:933-43.
  34. Dickerman B, Ahearn T, Giovannucci E, Stampfer M., Nguyen P, Mucci L, et al. Weight change, obesity and risk of prostate cancer progression among men with clinically localized prostate cancer. Int J Cancer. 2017;141(5):933-44. doi:10.1002/ijc.30803
  35. Allott E, Arab L, Su L, Farnan L, Fontham E, Mohler J. Saturated fat intake and prostate cancer aggressiveness: Results from the population-based North Carolina-Louisiana Prostate cancer project. Prostate Cancer Prost Dis. 2017;20(1):48-54.
  36. Veierød M, Laake P, Thelle D. Dietary fat intake and risk of prostate cancer: A prospective study of 25,708 Norwegian men. Int J Cancer. 1997;73(5):634-8. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0215(19971127)73:5%3C634::AID-IJC4%3E3.0. CO;2-Y
  37. Freeman J, Li J, Fisher S, Yao K, David S, Huo D. Declination of treatment, racial and ethnic disparity, and overall survival in US patients with breast cancer. J Am Med Assoc. 2024;7(5):e249449. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.9449
  38. Shulman R, Deng M, Handorf E, Meyer J, Lynch S, Arora S. Factors associated with racial and ethnic disparities in locally advanced rectal cancer outcomes. J Am Med Assoc.  2024;7(2):e240044. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024. 0044
  39. Senkin S, Moody S, Díaz-Gay M, Abedi-Ardekani B, Cattiaux T, Ferreiro-Iglesias A, et al. Geographic variation of mutagenic exposures in kidney cancer genomes. Nature. 2024:1-9.
  40. Byrne S, Boyle T, Ahmed M, Lee S, Benyamin B, Hyppönen E. Lifestyle, genetic risk and incidence of cancer: A prospective cohort study of 13 cancer types. International J Epidemiol. 2023;52(3):817-26. doi:10.1093/ije/ dyac238
  41. Plym A, Zhang Y, Stopsack K, Delcoigne B, Wiklund F, Haiman C, et al. A healthy lifestyle in men at increased genetic risk for prostate cancer. Eur Urol. 2023;83(4):343-51. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2022.05.008
  42. Langlais C, Graff R, Van-Blarigan E, Palmer N, Washington S, Chan J, et al. Post-diagnostic dietary and lifestyle factors and prostate cancer recurrence, progression, and mortality. Curr Oncol Rep. 2021;23:1-20.
  43. Ziglioli F, Patera A, Isgrò G, Campobasso D, Guarino G, Maestroni U. Impact of modifiable lifestyle risk factors for prostate cancer prevention: A review of the literature. Front Oncol. 2023;13. doi:10.3389%2Ffonc.2023. 1203791
  44. Dovey Z, Horowitz A, Waingankar N. The influence of lifestyle changes (diet, exercise and stress reduction) on prostate cancer tumour biology and patient outcomes: A systematic review. BJUI Compass. 2023;4(4):385-416. doi:10.1002/bco2.237
  45. Medici C, Jørgensen N, Juul A, Albrethsen J, Kreiberg M, Lauritsen J, et al. Insulin-like factor 3, basal and human chorionic gonadotropin-stimulated testosterone as biomarkers to predict the effect of testosterone replacement in testicular cancer survivors with mild leydig cell insufficiency. Clin Genit Cancer. 2024;22(1):e106-12. doi:10.1016/j.clgc.2023.08.005
  46. Kaplan-Marans E, Zhang T, Hu J. Oncologic outcomes of testosterone therapy for men on active surveillance for prostate cancer: A population-based analysis. Eur Urol Open Sci. 2024;60:36-43. doi:10.1016/j.euros.2024.01.005
  47. Theisen C. IOM report targets testosterone therapy. J Nat Cancer Inst. 2024;96(4):259. doi:10.1093/jnci/96.4.259
  48. Klotz L, Tat T. Testosterone nadir and clinical outcomes in patients with advanced prostate cancer: Post hoc analysis of triptorelin pamoate Phase III studies. BJUI Compass. 2024;5(3):392-402. doi:10.1002/bco2.318
  49. Dasgupta P, Baade P, Aitken J, Ralph N, Chambers S, Dunn J. Geographical variations in prostate cancer outcomes: A systematic review of international evidence. Front Oncol. 2018;9:238. doi:10.3389/fonc.2019.00238
  50. Baade P, Youlden D, Krnjacki L. International epidemiology of prostate cancer: Geographical distribution and secular trends. Mol Nut Food Res. 2009;53(2):171-84.

How to cite this article
Vancouver
Figueroa-Valverde L, Marcela R, Alvarez-Ramirez M, Lopez-Ramos M, Mateu-Armand V, Emilio A. Statistical Data from 1979 to 2022 on Prostate Cancer in Populations of Northern and Central Mexico. Bull Pioneer Res Med Clin Sci. 2024;4(1):24-30. https://doi.org/10.51847/snclnafVdg
APA
Figueroa-Valverde, L., Marcela, R., Alvarez-Ramirez, M., Lopez-Ramos, M., Mateu-Armand, V., & Emilio, A. (2024). Statistical Data from 1979 to 2022 on Prostate Cancer in Populations of Northern and Central Mexico. Bulletin of Pioneering Researches of Medical and Clinical Science, 4(1), 24-30. https://doi.org/10.51847/snclnafVdg
Related articles:
Most viewed articles:
Issue 1 Volume 6 - 2026